Category Archives: Bitching

The Papacy: Prognostication

As a fallen Catholic – who didn’t fall from very high – I have the worst reactions to the Pope’s announcement that he is quitting:

1 It matters because?
2 This German Pope was seventeen in 1945. Too young but so was the writer Gunther Grass, and see what happened.
3 Another set of priestly abuse horrors coming up?A friend of mine, an American sociologist who lives outside the US, sends me this perfect example of unspeakable cynicism:

A friend of mine, an American sociologist who lives in another country, has this cynical reaction to my reaction:

I know you don’t have a dog in this race, though as usual your forebodings are onto something. Here’s another scenario:

Sources close to the College of Cardinals have disclosed they will reach out to groups that Pope Benedict may have been insensitive to, and will select a Muslim pedophilic Nazi from Latin America as the Church’s next Pontiff. There are reportedly several qualified candidates in Argentina vying for the position.

But don’t quote me. ‘Unnamed sources’ will do.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Bitching

Bonfires (“Feux de joie.”)

American society has obvious lasting problems plus new problems coming in 2013 (See my editorial coming soon on this topic.) Other national societies also have lasting problems. In France, there is a massive deployment of police for New Year’s Eve . The principal police mission on that night  is to limit the number of privately owned cars deliberately burned in the street. The  arson benchmark for the whole year is 40,000. I couldn’t find any figure for that single night. It’s a government secret.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Bitching

European Union Resurrected. Arafat Exhumed!

Too much to do in this season to blog seriously. Also my continuing international conversations with the Dane I call Frans command some of my time. (They take the form of “Comments” to my essay entitled: “Challenge From Social-Democrat Denmark.”)

The Norwegian Nobel Committee is continuing its pathetic descent into irrelevancy. It just awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to the European Union, N. S. ! The awarding of the prize to Barack Obama for what he was going to do was just one stop on the way to oblivion.

I guess the EU deserves the prize because not even two of the 27 members have begun eviscerating each other at all for years. Way to go Europe! The prize also acts as a sort of resurrection for a dying dream.

The fall began when the Nobel Peace Prize Committee awarded the prize to the arch-terrorist Yasser Arafat. Want the prize? Murder many people and then, just stop.

Speaking of Arafat, notice the big silence following the exhumation of his body? An international team of forensic specialists is looking for signs of his having been poisoned. Big, big silence.

I think I know what killed him. Here are some hints: Why would you send your revered national leader to die in a foreign country? Why France? What are the French good for? What can they be counted on for? (Obviously, I don’t mean food!) Why a military hospital for an obviously dying man? What does military discipline add to the advantage gained by sending him to die in France?

No poison will be found.

15 Comments

Filed under Bitching, Current Events

No, Thanks.

I am not much on my blog these days because I am still trying to recover from the defeat. It’s not going well. As you can imagine, mine is not a case of doomed man-love for Gov. Romney. I am not Chris Matthew with the thing, the tingle, going up his leg when he thinks of Barack Obama, and the Governor is not Mr Obama.

I am musing about re-emigration. It’s ridiculous at my age, as well as impractical. Still, there is the strangest turnabout since the Soviet Union took Pres. Reagan’s invitation to get lost: Canada is doing better than the US economically as well as according to several of my values. I am remembering that treaty that put and end to the French and Indian Wars. I think it left the back door open for speakers of French.

And then, if I am going to live under statism why not do it under those who have much practice at it, and who also cook much better than Mexicans? (I am referring here to American restaurants here, obviously) I wonder if the French would take me back? Perhaps, if I promised to keep my mouth shut about the quality of French popular music? Some of you have noticed that I keep up with my French, just in case. That’s my Vichy side. (Look it up.)

This immigrant does not find much to be thankful for this year, for the first time ever. I think an economic disaster is coming to the USA. I hope I am simply wrong. By the way, where are my liberal critics who are always so eager to prove to me how completely and utterly wrong I am when I need them?

7 Comments

Filed under Bitching

America: The Declining Value

A second reaction to the election by an American living abroad, Philip Quinn. I am responsible for the bad formatting.

“A full account of the election would also include a county-scale map, which
would show this is essentially an urban-rural divide, which in turn reflects a division between the self-reliant and the culture of dependency.

Yet another aspect of the story is why the high-tech sector (Google,
etc.) is funding its own demise. Guilt, probably. New Money isn’t comfortable
with itself. Why me?, it asks. I don’t really deserve all this wealth: I have to Give Back. Then I’ll Feel Better About Myself. Then I can go on raking it in with a Good Conscience.

I know what you mean about the surprise-less mourning. Having handed Obama the next election on a silver platter in 2008 with the trillion-dollar
stimulus-pork, it seems the Republicans really don’t have it in them to win
national elections. They don’t have the guts to face down the affirmative-action mindset — the way Thomas Sowell does, for example. The Dems can go on playing the race card till the cows come home, adding the gender card and all the other cards for those seeking undeserved preferences, to get electoral majorities.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Bitching

All In!

Here is a reaction to the election by a friend of mine, Philip Quinn, an American who has been living abroad for many years. The bad formatting is mine. I copied and pasted from an email and I am kind of artless. Sorry.

“The election was decided by single women (24 percent of the electorate) who
want to fuck without consequence, and if a consequence occurs, snuff it out.
That, and the trillion-dollar stimulus-pork campaign fund. Next question.

No sooner is the election over than comes a revelation about a gal named
Broad-well who writes a fawning bio entitled ‘All In’ — not even the most
fervid pornographic imagination could make this up — while having an affair
with the general. But wait, as they say on the late-night tv commercials –
there’s more! A third woman, not the general’s wife, was being threatened by
this Broad-well broad. And they’re emailing each other on a gmail account.

What is it about girls named Paula? At least Paula Jones stuck by her man,
proving that trailer-park trash had a higher moral code than Clinton, who did
nothing to spring her from jail. Presidential pardons were reserved for crooks like Marc Rich.

The key tryout for Paula B was a run with the general. He ran faster, but they were both out of breath. Considering the general’s future in public office, the second edition of Broad-well’s book might have a revised title: ‘Dead Heat’.

Looks like this story will have legs.”

4 Comments

Filed under Bitching

Christians Riot Around World.

Catholics in Italy and in Spain, Orthodox Christians in Bulgaria, and many others in Scotland and South America rioted Thursday. They were triggered by the reports  that a fragment of papyrus suggested that Jesus the Christ was married.  Christians in several African countries burned down mosques with worshipers inside after looting the shops of Muslim merchants

The report incensed several varieties of Christians because it is a major article of faith among Christians that the Savior did not partake of the pleasures of the flesh (as marriage sometimes implies).

Elsewhere in the world, two Oslo rioters where shot dead by police trying to protect the embassies of Muslim countries. In Helsinki, ever-fanatical Lutherans tries to set the Egyptian Embassy on fire because the papyrus fragment in question originated in Egypt. One Finnish rioter declared that the new Islamist government of Egypt  concocted the blasphemous story or, at the very least, that it failed to censor it. Other rioters joined in to proclaim that the papyrus should have been suppressed out of respect for the Christian religion..

7 Comments

Filed under Bitching, Current Events, Short Stories

Atomic Radiation and Mental Health

The average level of radiation to which inhabitants of the beautiful city of Denver  are exposed is .9 rem (zero point nine). The level of radiation in the hots spots around the damaged Fukushima nuclear reactor was .1 rem (zero point one).  Yes, it’s nine times lower near Fukushima than in Denver.

Denver residents concerned about the effects exposure to radiation have on their health should evidently have moved to the Japanese hot spots for greater safety, it seems to me. I hear the price of real estate plummeted in that area.

The first paragraph is drawn from ” The Panic Over Fukushima” in the Review section of the Wall Street Journal of August 18 – 19 2012. The article is by Richard Muller, PhD,  a Professor of Physics at the University of California, Berkeley. (But what does he know?)

The cynical deduction in the second paragraph is mine, of course. Here are more.

Shouldn’t alarmists employ their high capacity for panic in connection with large and certain killers of people such as road accidents and the myriads of illnesses that unwashed hands cause?

How difficult is it to understand that nuclear energy is the cheapest and the safest alternative to poisonous coal emissions and to “blood for oil”? Yes, it’s that simple.

What happened at Fukushima was exceptionally bad: A reactor was assailed by  a big earthquake followed by a tsunami. It was not built to withstand either. In other words, the worst happened. What does one do with the deeply fallacious “precautionary principle” when the worst happens and no catastrophe ensues? Is the precautionary principle immune to empirical testing? Is it theology by chance?

Suppose half of pregnant women in America started drinking a lot and the state their children’s health was undistinguishable from that of the offspring of the non-drinking half. Should the health warning on alcohol containers be maintained, then?

I suspect, only suspect, that there  are many among us who would say “yes.” That would not be their first response however. The first would be forceful evasiveness. Then, threatened with a big fine, for example, they would answer the question above in the affirmative.

I often think a large fraction of our population is insane. This is seldom discussed because there is safety in numbers, even safety from critical description.

4 Comments

Filed under Bitching, Socio-Political Essays

Syrians’ Deaths Not Our Business (Updated January 2th 2013)

This was first published January 12th 2012, twelve months ago, and again in June 2012, five months ago. Below a January 2013 update

Brave Syrians continue to die day- by-day trying to get what we take for granted: The right to be governed by those they chose. And yes, that may include Islamists. What do you think? That bloody fascist tyranny is better (for us) ?  Syrians also die because of the Obama policy of “engaging” the likes of Assad. He, Assad, is using tanks on the soft bodies of unarmed civilians to make sure he does not miss. Ron Paul followers assure me that the slaughter of Syrians is none of our business. Apparently they think it’s OK for someone else to  conduct mass slaughter as long as it’s done neatly within the boundaries of a nation-state. That’s the same nation-state libertarians say they want to abolish.

Update January 2th 2013

In a civil war, it’s always difficult to know how many civilian victims there are. Even the good guys exaggerate routinely. However, today, the UN said 65,000 Syrian have died since the beginning of the current crisis. (Reminder: The beginning was peaceful protests against the fascist regime.) In the absence of a Human Rights Watch estimate, that UN number will do, more or less for me. To get an idea of the scale of the killing by comparing the estimate with total population numbers, you have to multiply it by thirty. That would be about two million Americans killed.

The usual chorus of left-iberal tender-hearts is silent. As I have said before, it’s only when Jews kill Arabs that it matters. Since I first aired the piece above, Israelis did kill about 150 Gazans in war . Many of the Gazan victims had asked for it; many not, were just in the way;  other Gazans  asked for it implicitly only by voting for a party that has the elimination of Israel in its charter. (Link to the charter in English on this blog.)

As as always been the case, as has been the case from the beginning, Israelis are rank amateurs at killing Arabs. Arabs are enormously better at it. Look here:

65,000/150

The inaction of western public opinion, the immobility of our political class is not just prudence. If it were, there would be inaction accompanied by  loud vocalizations:. “We don’t want to get involved but we think Assad is a butcher; We hope he ends up hanging from a lamp-post downtown Damas.” (I hope so; personally, I think he will.)

Am I the only one who suspects that  a form of racism underlies our collective silence?

Well,  an Arab hoodlum is using warplanes against apartment houses that are sure to shelter women and small children . No big deal. That’s what Arabs do!

A last comment in the form of a question: I don’t understand why the powerful and skillful Israeli Air Force is not parachuting masses of humanitarian aid  well marked with the Star of David over areas of Syria were refugees are concentrated. I am thinking powdered milk and clean water, for example.

27 Comments

Filed under Bitching, Current Events

The French Presidentials and Cinco de Mayo

I have been busy producing a legible an clean copy of my memoirs: “I Used to Be French….” It’s an endless process. By the way, if you are an agent, don’t be shy about asking to read this remarkable and witty document.

While my back was turned, the world continued to turn. The French lost the battle of Puebla and they lost an election, all in the same day.

People in California celebrate Cinco de Mayo with beer and more expensive stuff. Few know what they are celebrating, Anglos, never, children of Mexicans, seldom, Mexican immigrants, often but not always. Myself, I celebrate too because I like beer, Mexicans and Mexican beer. I celebrate discretely though.

In the battle of Puebla, in 1862, under the presidency of Benito Juarez, a Mexican army achieved victory over a French expeditionary forces against all expectations. What happened is that the French thought they were on their way to Prussia to beat on that emerging power before it was too late. They turned right instead of left outside Paris by mistake. Somehow, they ended up in Mexico and the rest is history, mostly forgotten history. They left behind in Mexico, probably pan dulces, and less probably, the name for roving musicians in charro costumes, mariachis (“marriage”).

Pretty much the same thing happened Sunday in France except that the French turned left when they should have turned right. They elected the grayest, least accomplished politician of all times to be their president for five years. He has done even less in his lifetime than Barack Obama and he is not even black!

Mr Sarkozy’s goose was cooked anyway. He talked the talk but he did not not walk the walk of reform away from a a welfare state the French kind of know they can’t afford. Much of Sarkozy’s presidency was wasted on the soap opera of his private life. Beside, finally, in reality, those European governments that were in power in the fall of 2008  have been tossed, irrespective of their political color. That’s the rule. Bad luck but that’s the way it is.

What’s wrong with last Sunday’s French presidential election is not that the Socialist Party won it; the handwriting was on the wall. What’s wrong is that the winner, Mr Hollande, is a nobody. He only became the Socialist candidate because an overzealous New York prosecutor first accepted the word of a chambermaid who turned out to be a liar.

I keep wondering how different French contemporary history would be if the complainant had not been a person “of color” and if the complaint were not about a sexual assault but about a theft, for example. The fact is that Mr Strass-Khan, the most likely Socialist presidential candidate then probably knows something about economics and that Mr Hollande, his last-minute replacement, probably does not.

Two things are at stake, here. First, in spite of the farcical aspects of the French election, France is an important country, the second biggest economy in Europe in most years. If that big country also attacks the prudent, intellectually obvious financial position of Germany, it may just carry the day in Europe and that will be the end of the Euro. The wise German Chancellor might yield or her coalition might just be swept out.

The second possible consequence of Mr Hollande’s Socialist victory is the same that threatens most of Europe. The continent is not going to disappear in a big hole as some of the most intemperate conservative commentaries would seem to have it. Instead, it may well become Argentina. What threatens Europe today is not “Socialism,” whatever that means today; it’s Peronismo. I mean ever-increasing benefits for regular people accompanied by every public effort to make the rich leave and associated with the creation of a political climate that repels all investment.

What a new French President was supposed to deal with  and will not is this: The French economy has been run for thirty years like a prosperous summer camp. The main concern has been to create more games, more opportunities for fun, more celebration, more fun overall without concern for paying the bill. The bill is coming due; it’s been fun; few politicians are willing to acknowledge the simple fact.

Mr Hollande comes from the wing of his party that has not had a thought in forty years. He is not likely to understand or to tell his fellow citizens, “Time to wind down the party.” His most-noted promise is to return the legal age of retirement in France from sixty-two to sixty. Simple!

Rarely in history has an act of collective self-sabotage been so clear, so obvious. Denmark, Sweden, and Germany conducted the necessary reforms several years ago. Their economies are thriving. The rest of the Europeans are stumping the ground with their little feet screaming, ” No, I don’t want to go home from the party; leave me alone! I hate you!!!”

For the French, it will be another battle of Puebla: They will have no recollection they took the wrong turn; they will soon have forgotten that they took part in a war. Their children will not have any knowledge that they lost it.

6 Comments

Filed under Bitching, Current Events