Pot Shops and the Evils of Government

It seems to me that few people dare entertain the thought that government is inherently bad, that it’s bad even when it’s honest and well-intentioned. That was pretty much what the founders of this republic thought but the idea is almost lost. Even when ordinary people think of bad, oppressive government, they usually have the distant federal government in mind. But it’s too far, precisely, too large, it has too many tentacles. Perhaps it’s easier to understand the moral issue if you consider something smaller and closer. The city of Santa Cruz in California (population about 50,000) just gave us a clear example of well-intentioned government action with predictably bad consequences. It’s small and it’s innocent. Repeat: innocent.

The city council just decreed that there could be only two medicinal marijuana shops in the city. Two consequences.

1 The council has created by decision a quasi-monopoly. Absent such restrictions, there might have been one hundred pot shops at first. After a short time, the number would have dwindled to a small number, possibly only two. But the winners would have been those offering the best combination of price and quality. The latter, understood widely to include possibly diversity of products and quality of service, an essential ingredient in serving presumably sick buyers.

Instead, we are going to end up with the first two applicants. That’s if the decision-making process is honest. Those two may be the worst possible or they may just be mediocre. The city’s decision is another factor, a small factor to be sure, of local high cost of living and a low level of satisfaction. Multiply this decision by 10 million and you have the Soviet Union’s economy. (Reminder: The Soviet Union did not just deny freedom, it denied a decent standard of living and the dignity that comes with not having to scramble for oranges.)

2 An artificial limit on enterprise is an invitation to corruption. Each license to operate is made artificially valuable. If you apply, you will be tempted to increase your chances by greasing the right palm. Not casting aspersions. I am not saying it’s going to happen in Santa Cruz. I am stating however, that it would be less likely to happen if there were no numerical limitations shops, any shops. The more opportunities for corruption you create, the more actual corruption there will be, other things being equal. Most government actions and all regulations generate corruption opportunities. That’s true when everyone involved in formulating them is 100% honest.

Now, go back mentally to the federal government level and think of the mischief in the current health care bill.

Look for my posting on innocent government evil on this blog.


About Jacques Delacroix

I am a sociologist, a short-story writer, and a blogger (Facts Matter and Notes On Liberty) in Santa Cruz, California.
This entry was posted in Socio-Political Essays and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Pot Shops and the Evils of Government

  1. clambo slice says:

    A truly intelligent city council would ban the sale of “medical marijuana”. The term is nonsense. I invite any proponent of this foolishness to bring a bong into a hospital and try to light up. Explain how my mother who was 86 and had never smoked a day in her life could use pot. The so-called benefits of pot already exist in several forms: pills, patches, and transdermal creams. The possible benefit of pot, which is a melange of many non-beneficial and harmful chemicals is outweighed by the bad side effects: hallucination, anxiety and others. I can not understand how deliberately causing severe anxiety from pot can benefit any patient, except only those who are actually pot addicts (no one today is a casual user of such a strong drug).

    • jacquesdelacroix says:

      A truly intelligent city council would ban tobacco sales because tobacco is bad for you. It would ban alcohol which is the cause of many car accidents. It would ban fast food joints because their customers often litter. It would ban skateboarding because it annoys some old ladies. Most of all, a truly intelligent city council would ban churches because, historically, churches and the beliefs they propagate are responsible for countless atrocities and for millions of pointless slaughters. I am not completely sure about banning libraries but it’s a fact that some books have a bad influences on people’s behavior.

  2. Pingback: Pot Shops and the Evils of Government | Notes On Liberty

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s