Rights of “Occupy” Crowd Violated

The First Amendment specifies that “Congress” shall make no law interfering with the right of citizens “peaceably to assemble.” The Bill of Rights of the State of New York contains no such provision. I have no legal training but I deplore admitting that it sounds to me as if the city police of New York faces no constitutional impediment when it orders the “Occupy” movement to stop camping on that private park where they have been for weeks.

I deplore this reading of the law because I believe, by instinct, and possibly by a common misreading of the Constitution, that the right of all and any Americans to assemble is central, absolute and all too often stepped on by local authorities and by petty tyrants. All too often, I see locally or, indirectly, everywhere through the national press, the nuisances crowds create used to interfere radically with what I take to be the right of assembly.

Whenever this happens, it disturbs me that many of my fellow conservatives seem to buy the authorities’ reasoning. Here, locally, in Santa Cruz, the reasons local power gives to begin dismantling the “Occupy” encampment are fire risk and public health. The way I understand it, this does not make moral sense to me. I don’t like the “Occupy” crowd, I have expressed why in previous postings (Woman’s Mind; The Mysteries of “Occupy;” the Libertarian Side of the Movement; Syrians, posted Oct 27th 2011 – “Update on “Occupy Wall Street, and Santa Cruz….”, Obama Won the Western GOP Debate” posted October 19th 2011 – “Occupy Wall Street; Don’t Attack Grandma: The New Class Struggle” posted October 14th)

Excuse the childish lack of control over layout, please.

But my dislikes have nothing to do with my understanding of the guarantees under which we live. Or they should have nothing to do with this understanding.

I am not against repression but we live in a legal tradition that predates the American Constitution by centuries. In that tradition, one can only be punished for specific acts that have to be pre-defined as specifically illegal. “You annoy me” does not count!

it seems to me. And there can be no collective punishment under that tradition.

Accordingly, “Occupy “ demonstrators can be cited individually for littering in a manner that creates a fire hazard. They can be cited for urinating and for defecating in public places. They can be cited for making loud noises. For all I care, they can be cited for spitting on the sidewalk.

They should not be forced by the threat of legalized violence to stop exercising what I think is their right of free assembly. The argument that the relevant government entity does “not have the resources” to stop them individually from acting in a disgusting manner is especially objectionable. It’s objectionable because it plays on good people’ sense of decency to cause them to forget or to put to sleep their ideal of constitutional government.

A society of law is not only for my friends and for people I approve of. Right?

Update:11/16/11: I read in the Wall Street Journal today that the owner of the Manhattan park from which the protestors were evicted requested the eviction. That changes everything about that particular situation, of course. It does not invalidate my constitutional musings.


About Jacques Delacroix

I am a sociologist, a short-story writer, and a blogger (Facts Matter and Notes On Liberty) in Santa Cruz, California.
This entry was posted in Current Events. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Rights of “Occupy” Crowd Violated

  1. Bruce says:

    When I became an officer in the U.S. Navy I took a solemn oath to defend the Constitution. The freedom that American citizens have do various things are constitutional rights and I will defend their rights to do those things. It;’s hard to come up with something that won’t piss off some people. Our founders made a lot of people angry. It’s an American tradition. For those looking for something a little less diverse, where expressed public opinion is more consistent, North Korea might be a good fit. They have lots of government sanctioned assemblies you might just be required to attend. As for me, it’s a lot more fun being in a free country where I can be constantly amazed by what people come up with when they have liberty. Our founders got it right on.

    • jacquesdelacroix says:

      In the same vein, and less extremely: I have tried three times to send an email comment to the centrist French newspaper Le Figaro. It’s not a government organ at all. All three of my comments were rejected for being “too harsh” and “too controversial.” The result is predictable: I have stopped trying. That’s in the sister republic of the US whose bill of rights would bring tears to your eyes. I was not up against government but against a culture of conciliation that constitutes a major obstacle to self-improvement

  2. Pingback: Rights of “Occupy” Crowd Violated « Notes On Liberty

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s