Some Unimportant Comments On the French Election

I have not said much about the first round of the French presidential elections because there is either little to say or because no one I know is interested in going as far as I would have to go to say anything interesting. The Wall Street Journal for one has done a fine job of covering the election and of commenting on it. Here I go, nevertheless. I followed the campaign and I thought it was surrealistic or maybe, like a Club Med performance.

Three topics that never got any traction during the campaign: 1 What to do about national indebtedness (90% of GDP, no worse than ours today); 2 What to do about non-existent economic growth; 3 In the long run, is there a connection between the two issues

It’s not the case that there was no debate, just not that debate. On the tarmac: Keep the Euro, to what extent? Retirement at 62 or back to 60, again? Is Pres. Sarkozy rude? Are the rating agencies including the one that took away France’s AAA rating anti-French? Should the Europeans, the French, start their own rating agency? (Would I make this up? Maybe the European Rating Agency could be in the charge of Greece.)

The big surprise – which should not have been one – is the good showing of Marine Le Pen’s Front National. It’s reputed to be racist but I think that’s the after-image from the bad old days when her loudmouth father was running the show. She has cleaned up her party’s act. Now, I think she won big because she speaks to frustrated, ordinary French people a language they understand. That’s the language of economic fallacy focusing on trade protectionism and the state control of capital movements. It’s the same fallacies that many people in this country carry in their heads. The difference with France is that there, they have their own party! That’s more democratic, in a way.

There is a essay I am thinking of writing but don’t because I am afraid it would turn into a thick book: In today’s world, if you don’t know English, you are liable to be systematically misinformed.

Here is a reaction to the news of the Florida shooter being freed on bail I picked up in the readers’ mail of the major French paper Le Figaro: “Money allows you to buy yourself out of anything!” (My competent translation.) The person who wrote this thinks that by posting bail, the shooter has put an end to all his trouble. If you told her that there is going to be a trial and that the shooter just might do time, she would probably tell you she does not believe in the tooth fairy.

Back to the French elections: Sarkozy will lose. It won’t be because of what he did or didn’t do. It will be because every politician who was in power in the fall of 2008 bites the dust the first time there is an election. That’ regardless of party affiliation or left/right orientation.

François Hollande will become president of France. He is all skim-milk, not even 2% milk. He is a lifelong Socialist Party bureaucrat whose main connection to power is that he used to share a bedroom, with the woman, Ségolène Royal, who lost the election the last time around. Like our president, Hollande has never accomplished anything in his life. And he is not even black!

For a short time, the French Socialist party looked like it was going to put forth ideas different from those it has been pushing for the last thirty years. Then, a New York City hotel chambermaid complained loudly and it was back to the old days for the Socialists. But you know that story already.

About Jacques Delacroix

I am a sociologist, a short-story writer, and a blogger (Facts Matter and Notes On Liberty) in Santa Cruz, California.
This entry was posted in Current Events. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Some Unimportant Comments On the French Election

  1. Scott Cochran says:


    But that is not the real fascination; we in the US, especially in California are looking for hope from other hopelessly indebted societies for some indicator of corrective action. “How bad can does it get before a democracy votes to make it better? (and where are we on this scale?)”. “Is it possible at all, or are the French, and likely us, past the ‘tipping point’ (where all hope is lost and the wisest course of action is to join, rather exceed, the plunderers and gain enough to survive the decline as long as possible.)

    There are obvious limitations to this analogy, we are not the French, we only have so much in common, and that degree is debatable. But we look for hope where ever we can find it. And a shoe in for an Obama-like nobody is not hope.

    • jacquesdelacroix says:

      Scott: I think there is no tipping point in an economic sense. In the US in general, we don’t have any problems that wouldn ‘t be on their way to a solution with five consecutive years of 4% growth. That would be enough to save even California from the dire poverty that’s coming (I agree about this). For this country, getting there is not that difficult. The American people have a good sense of what’s required, at least, many do.

      The French seem in a different position because there is not free market voice in their society, zero. Yet, they manage and they have managed for many years with good products and a high level of productivity. The mystery is less of a mystery than it seems. The famed French 35 hours week for example? Try reaching anyone important in most offices of government and most companies on a normal Friday at 2:30 in this country. We are not far behind the French, we are just hypocritical about matters of work.

      Incidentally, I put up a short posting recently pointing out that the French debt/GDP ratio is about the same as the American.

  2. Pingback: Around the Web « Notes On Liberty

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s